The Teachers College debate last week between Ms. Darling-Hammond and Ms. Keegan, which was webcast live by edweek.org, resulted in a vigorous, and at times pointed, discussion about merit pay, early-childhood education, and other issues under the title 鈥淓ducation and the Next President.鈥�
Calling performance-based pay for teachers a 鈥渒ey part鈥� of Sen. McCain鈥檚 education program, Ms. Keegan described a plan in which school principals would be in charge of evaluating their own staff members. Sen. McCain, she said, would like to have federal money go directly to schools so principals could reward teachers primarily on the basis of student achievement.
But, she added, inevitably, the teachers鈥� unions just won鈥檛 come on board.
鈥淲e have so many constraints around being able to pay teachers for their own performance, mostly in the bargained agreements, that there is no way to do it now,鈥� Ms. Keegan said.
Ms. Darling-Hammond touted an approach that the unions endorse, in which new teachers get professional development and support from expert mentors who also help make decisions about tenure.
Teachers who were to be rewarded, said Ms. Darling-Hammond, would 鈥渘eed to demonstrate excellence in the classroom and evidence of contributions to student learning and achievement.鈥�
After the debate, four education experts provided a reality check on the campaign advisers鈥� comments at a panel discussion moderated by 91直播. They picked apart the candidates鈥� views on early education鈥攁nd particularly Sen. Obama鈥檚 plan to put $10 billion into an expansion of prekindergarten programs.
The panel participants seemed to agree that early-childhood education is a good place for an investment of federal funds, although all made the point that it鈥檚 unlikely that an Obama administration鈥攐r a McCain administration, for that matter鈥攚ould have that much money available.
Lucy Caulkins, a Teachers College professor, supports ramping up federal spending on pre-K programs, saying they can help children who are at risk of academic failure get on the right track before they even start school.
Eugene W. Hickok, who served deputy secretary in the federal Department of Education earlier in President Bush鈥檚 tenure, said the government should track whether federal dollars improve outcomes for students. He said that was more important than targeting the money to specific policies.
Also on the panel were Jeffrey Henig, a professor of political science and education at Teachers College, and Joseph P. Viteritti, a public-policy professor at New York City鈥檚 Hunter College.
